I personally find it difficult, as the gambling industry doesn't have that many individual developers, and gambling is a win-lose game, with a longer profit path compared to ordinary games. Anyone with a bit of economic sense knows that with the same capabilities, they would not choose to give up normal game development.
Moreover, normal game development carries no risk. If the game you develop becomes famous, the money you earn might not even be there for you to spend, which is a real issue.
Ideals are beautiful, and it's news that STAKE could make this move, but reality is very harsh.
Stake wants to engage in open platform activities.
Comments0
You can choose not to support it, but don't badmouth it.
Purely expressing one's own opinion
STAKE has always stood at the forefront of industry innovation, and I believe they can achieve it.
Watch and see, come back in three years and see if you were right.
Disagree, but reserve opinions.
Follow the big tree for a good shade; it's a good direction, but unfortunately, I can't do it.
If I had the development skills, I would definitely do it.
I don't know if it's practical for them, I only know it's not practical for me.
Some people are fond of the gambling industry, just like how Musk can find so many talents for building rockets. Why don't those who build rockets go into making electric cars instead? Isn't it more profitable? Everyone has their own career choices and priorities, not everyone is as materialistic as
Most people won't do this; I mean, the majority. No argument.
The idea of stake is definitely correct; many of their games are now made by collaborative studios, and they have already tasted the benefits, so it's not impossible.
a small part
I'm not optimistic
In the past, there was a company that expanded and then started a fund to get involved in real estate, but they ended up getting arrested.
Many companies expand as they grow, which is quite normal.
/ THE END /
