At the final hearing on the offshore gaming industry (POGO) held by the Philippine Senate on November 26, Senator Risa Hontiveros once again spoke out, pointing out that POGO-related scam centers may not only be involved in gambling and fraud, but could also be used as platforms for spreading false information to influence public thoughts and emotions.
Hontiveros stated at the hearing that there is reliable information indicating that some scam centers are used to spread false news, inciting social conflicts and national sentiments.
"This information is very disturbing, and it confirms my previous suspicions. These scam centers are not only involved in gambling, fraud, and human trafficking, but could even become tools for influencing thoughts," she said.
She noted that if the negative news targeting her and Senator Zhang Qiaowei originated from these scam networks, she would not be surprised.
At the same hearing, Philippine Navy Rear Admiral Rommel Jude Ong also expressed similar concerns. He emphasized that POGO, as a criminal economic activity, could foster illegal acts through cooperation with local government officials.
His research report stated: "These operators may have transformed into agents for external forces, supporting illegal activities and interfering in local politics by spreading nationalist sentiments, among other means, to limit the activities of competitors."
Ong further warned that POGO could not only have a negative impact on the economic field but also pose a threat to social stability by spreading false information and stirring up internal conflicts.
POGO has long been a controversial focus in Philippine society. Supporters believe it brings economic benefits, but critics argue that it not only involves criminal activities but also serves as a hotbed for money laundering, fraud, and other illegal acts. The accusations at this hearing that POGO could be used to manipulate public opinion undoubtedly add a new dimension to this controversial topic.
As the investigation deepens, the Senate's conclusions could have a profound impact on the future of the Philippine gaming industry policy and national information security protection.
