In Maha Sarakham Province, former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra publicly criticized those opposing the government's casino entertainment complex project, accusing them of misinterpreting the project as merely a casino construction. Thaksin explained that gambling-related activities account for less than 10% of the complex, with the rest primarily used for developing other attractions and facilities.
The 75-year-old Thaksin emphasized that each casino could create at least 20,000 jobs, with each employee earning no less than 20,000 Thai Baht per month. He countered critics who focused only on the casino aspect and spread false information.
Thaksin mentioned that the idea of an entertainment center with a casino was first proposed during the Thai Rak Thai government's time. At that point, Singapore had not yet built its first entertainment complex. "Initially, the plan was strongly opposed by hypocrites, but Singapore persisted, and its success has now been proven. Now, we should seize the opportunity and move forward," he said.
Thaksin made these remarks on February 1, while participating in an election event for the Move Forward Party candidates in Maha Sarakham Province.
On January 14, the Thai Cabinet had in principle approved the entertainment complex bill. However, Thaksin rebutted calls from some quarters for a national referendum on the legalization of casinos.
Meanwhile, Pheu Thai Party MP Nont Phayomlinchaloeunjit expressed concerns about potential loopholes in the bill. He pointed out that while licensed operators are responsible for implementing anti-money laundering measures, lack of effective oversight could lead the government to overlook associated risks.
Nont urged the government to include specific mechanisms to prevent money laundering in the bill and demanded that casinos report financial transactions to the relevant committee and submit them to the Anti-Money Laundering Office (AMLO) for review to ensure transparency.
Democrat Party MP Julin Laksanawisit noted that considering the project was not included in the election manifesto, he suggested a national referendum on this controversial project.
Senator Nantana Nantawaropas added that the Senate is waiting for more details to assess the potential economic and social issues the project might raise.
She also noted that although a national referendum is costly and complex, it could be a viable solution if it effectively addresses the issues.
