The deregulated approach of Trump could particularly favor operators in states like Nevada and New Jersey, while under Harris, casino operators could expect closer scrutiny over marketing practices and more robust compliance measures to monitor and prevent problematic gambling. By Damian Martinez, journalist at G&M News.
As the United States heads into one of its most anticipated elections next week, the eyes of the gaming and casino industry are sharply focused on what the outcome could mean for their future. With former President Donald Trump (Republican Party) and current Vice President Kamala Harris (Democratic Party) vying for the nation’s top job, the stakes are high, and each candidate’s approach to the economy, regulation, and tourism could uniquely impact one of the country’s most resilient yet vulnerable sectors.
The casino industry is a massive economic driver and a barometer of the territory’s overall leisure and entertainment health. Casinos contribute billions in tax revenue, create tens of thousands of jobs, and fuel tourism and local development. This election could be a turning point, determining whether the industry will see greater deregulation, federal support, or more stringent oversight.
Donald Trump: Advocating for deregulation and economic revival
As a former President with direct experience in the casino industry, Trump has positioned himself as a strong advocate for reducing regulations to bolster economic growth. His return to the campaign trail emphasizes a vision of reduced federal oversight across industries, including gaming and hospitality. In recent statements, Trump has argued that loosening regulations would empower the private sector to innovate and drive economic revival. His focus is also on tax incentives for businesses, which he claims will catalyze job creation and attract investment.
Speaking at a recent rally, Trump expressed his belief that the casino industry could benefit significantly from “getting the government out of the way.” His potential election could mean less interference for casinos, allowing them to operate with more flexibility and reduce compliance costs. This deregulated approach could particularly favor operators in states like Nevada and New Jersey, where he argues they are overly burdened by red tape and federal constraints.
Yet, Trump’s vision is not without its critics. Opponents argue that deregulation could lead to predatory practices and increased problematic gambling, especially if online gaming expands unchecked. Still, for many casino operators, Trump’ plans for cutting taxes and decreasing federal involvement signal a friendlier business climate that could help drive tourism and economic resurgence.
Kamala Harris: A focus on social responsibility and industry regulation
For her part, current Vice President has expressed her intentions to prioritize consumer protection, which could lead to increased regulation for the gaming sector. Harris has stated that the Government has a role in ensuring that casino operators conduct business responsibly, especially as online and mobile gambling platforms grow. She has also discussed the importance of worker protections, which would likely influence labor practices in the casino industry, affecting both casino staff and service vendors.
In a recent speech, Harris underscored her commitment to “responsible growth” for industries like gaming, which she described as essential to balancing business interests with public welfare. Harris has hinted that her administration would pursue policies to curb problem gambling and protect minors from online betting platforms. She believes this can be achieved without stifling economic growth, but rather by enforcing stricter guidelines on how casinos promote and manage their services.
Under Harris, casino operators could expect closer scrutiny over marketing practices and more robust compliance measures to monitor and prevent risk gambling behavior, encouraging fair play. This approach could increase operational costs for casinos, but her supporters argue that it would contribute to a healthier, more sustainable industry.
A divided industry outlook
The casino sector’s response to each candidate’s stance is notably divided. While large operators in states like Nevada and New Jersey may favor Trump’s promise of a hands-off approach, others, especially smaller operators and emerging online platforms, are more cautious. The fear of uncontrolled expansion of online gambling under Trump raises concerns for companies focused on responsible gambling. Conversely, Harris’s supporters in the industry believe that a stronger regulatory approach could promote longer-term stability, even if it raises operational challenges in the short term.
With each candidate presenting a vastly different trajectory for the casino sector, the upcoming election will likely set the tone for either a freer market or a more regulated landscape, each with its risks and rewards. As casinos across the nation prepare for next week, industry leaders and policymakers will be closely watching to see which vision will shape the future trajectory of the sector in an era marked by rapid change and new challenges.
